Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84029

in Grantsville, UtahPopulation 14,869

54.24/ 100

Ranked #10,390 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #147 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #28 of 43 Salt Lake City-Murray, UT ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

20.6 mi

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.9%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.3%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Grantsville, Utah (ZIP 84029) ranks in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,390th) and the bottom 48% of Utah (147th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 7.0% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum, distance to an emergency room sits in the top 5.1% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled fine-particle is in the top 5.9% nationally, modeled disaster risk stands in the top 7.2% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 8.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 84069, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.4–27.7
High blood pressure among adults30.3%27.3–33.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.5–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
Depression among adults29.0%25.5–32.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.9%27.7–34.1
Obesity among adults37.5%32.6–42.6
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.7–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.6–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.9%63.6–70.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.5%67.1–74.1
Cholesterol screening among adults80.5%78.0–83.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%55.6–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.3%65.1–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%62.8–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%11.0–15.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.4–12.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%17.5–24.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%34.4–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.0–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.2–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.6–19.0
Any disability among adults31.9%28.0–36.0
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.3
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%17.0–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.3–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.0–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–7.9
Loneliness among adults33.8%30.2–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate85.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households40.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+8.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age31.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$101,365$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$489,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,166$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured