ZIP code
84113
in Salt Lake City, UtahPopulation 264
49.61/ 100
Ranked #16,773 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)
Ranked #233 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranked #34 of 43 Salt Lake City-Murray, UT ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
16.8%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
45.1%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
14.6%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
1.8%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
3.5%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
46.1%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.1%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
5.7%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
22.7%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 84113, one of several in Salt Lake City, Utah ranks in the bottom 48% nationally (16,773rd) and the bottom 18% of Utah (233rd).
Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled colon screening is in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and slow internet speeds stands at the national maximum. Modeled loneliness settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and cognitive disability lies in the top 2.8% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 0.8% nationally, high blood pressure lands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 0.9% nationally, stroke rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and mobility disability is in the bottom 1.2% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs it borders, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 84108, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 99%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 89%
11%
Disability
healthier than 75%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 98%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 66%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 26%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 6%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 1%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 53%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 3%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 13%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 20%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 93%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 56%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 32%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
84108
Utahshares a border
Score 64.90
Closest healthier
84112
Utahshares a border
Score 50.88
Similar health profile
98195
Washington99% similar profile
Score 53.87
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 9.0% | 8.0–10.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 14.6% | 13.1–16.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 2.1% | 1.9–2.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.2% | 11.6–14.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 1.8% | 1.6–2.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.7% | 2.1–3.2 |
| Depression among adults | 35.5% | 31.8–38.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 3.5% | 3.1–4.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 16.8% | 15.2–18.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 25.6% | 22.1–29.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.1% | 1.0–1.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.1% | 16.5–23.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.9% | 8.5–13.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 39.2% | 36.6–42.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 63.7% | 60.2–66.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 65.1% | 60.4–69.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 45.1% | 41.4–48.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 62.4% | 59.5–65.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.8% | 61.6–73.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.9% | 13.9–18.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 6.4% | 4.9–8.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 17.3% | 13.8–21.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.1% | 33.9–40.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.2% | 12.3–18.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 26.0% | 21.5–29.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.5% | 8.6–12.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 22.7% | 17.8–26.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.3% | 25.8–35.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.5% | 3.1–4.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.6% | 7.3–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 5.7% | 4.7–6.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.9% | 1.6–2.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.8–5.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.7% | 21.1–28.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.5% | 16.2–26.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.4% | 7.4–13.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.4% | 11.2–17.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 10.2–15.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 46.1% | 41.9–50.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.8% | 7.7–11.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | UT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 7.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 100.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 28.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283 |
| Foreign-born population | 10.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 49.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 15.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284 |
| Median age | 19.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 35.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | UT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.3 yr ± 2.18 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.18 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured