Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84071

in Stockton, UtahPopulation 2,020

57.05/ 100

Ranked #7,226 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #105 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #20 of 43 Salt Lake City-Murray, UT ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5 days/year

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.0%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$134,179

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.5%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.0%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.2%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Stockton, Utah (ZIP 84071) ranks in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,226th) and the top 37% of Utah (105th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 3.3% nationally, household income lands in the top 6.2% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the top 7.0% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum, and modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 5.3% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 84069, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 36.3; chronic-disease standing 89.2 — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,682 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%21.3–26.4
High blood pressure among adults28.6%25.6–31.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.0%3.6–4.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.8–5.2
Depression among adults28.6%25.2–32.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.2%7.1–9.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.1%26.9–33.3
Obesity among adults36.8%31.9–41.8
Stroke among adults2.3%2.0–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.2%5.8–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.6–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.5%61.8–68.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.4%67.0–73.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.1%79.8–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%57.6–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.5%66.4–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%65.2–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.6–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.2%7.6–11.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%15.3–21.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%34.7–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.1%12.2–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.1–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.3–13.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.4–17.4
Any disability among adults28.7%25.2–32.4
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Mobility disability among adults9.8%8.3–11.3
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.6–22.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.7–5.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Loneliness among adults33.1%29.6–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–649.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription98.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate91.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households39.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age34.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$134,179$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$458,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,318$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 2.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.08 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured