Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98811

in Ardenvoir, WashingtonPopulation 6

60.22/ 100

Ranked #4,694 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.7%)

Ranked #111 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #2 of 22 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA ZIPs (top 9.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.3%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.2%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

15.4 mi

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Ardenvoir, Washington (ZIP 98811) lands in the top 14.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,694th) and the top 19% of Washington (111th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides at the national minimum. Poverty registers at the national minimum, and homeownership rests at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, and modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 1.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled mammography lands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, distance to a nursing home sits in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled binge drinking is in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled fine-particle settles in the top 6.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 98826, about 5.2 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%20.3–25.9
High blood pressure among adults30.2%26.6–33.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.5–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.1–6.6
Depression among adults22.3%19.2–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%7.8–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%30.7–37.9
Obesity among adults28.4%23.3–33.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.4–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.4–9.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%5.2–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.6%62.4–70.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.5%63.3–71.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.1%79.4–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%60.0–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%64.0–70.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.3%58.6–73.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%16.9–23.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%9.9–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.8%13.1–20.7
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%25.2–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%12.4–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.1–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.2–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%10.4–15.9
Any disability among adults25.2%20.6–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Independent living disability among adults5.9%4.8–7.3
Mobility disability among adults9.7%7.8–12.0
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.5–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.6%2.9–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+100.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 2.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.45 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured