Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

80137

in Watkins, ColoradoPopulation 1,689

55.96/ 100

Ranked #8,319 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #237 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #96 of 127 Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

59.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$134,890

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.9%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST27th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

98%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.8%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.6 mi

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST37th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Watkins, Colorado (ZIP 80137), in overall standing, comes out in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,319th) and the top 47% of Colorado (237th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: household income rests in the top 6.0% nationally, modeled pfas settles in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and homeownership lands in the top 5.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes settles in the top 2.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water lands at the national maximum. Walkability rests in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and modeled mammography settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests in the bottom 10.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 80016, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.7%22.8–26.7
High blood pressure among adults30.2%27.9–32.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%8.0–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.0%10.1–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Depression among adults22.0%20.1–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%31.1–35.6
Obesity among adults29.2%26.2–32.6
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.9–13.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%9.7–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.4%68.8–73.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.1%68.6–73.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.7–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%56.7–62.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%61.6–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.8%62.6–72.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%16.4–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.2–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.1%16.9–21.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.1%29.2–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%14.9–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.9–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.6–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.7–15.7
Any disability among adults28.1%25.4–30.9
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6419.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate98.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population10.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$134,890$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$669,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured