Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98282

in Camano Island, WashingtonPopulation 17,303

60.29/ 100

Ranked #4,653 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.6%)

Ranked #110 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

59.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.0%

in the bottom 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Camano Island, Washington (ZIP 98282) ranks in the top 14.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,653rd) and the top 19% of Washington (110th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and colon screening rests in the top 3.5% nationally. Elder services is in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 8.7% nationally, binge drinking lies in the bottom 13.8% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Against that, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 2.0% nationally, expected annual loss registers in the top 6.0% nationally, and pfas sits in the top 8.3% nationally.

In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 98260, about 0.7 miles away. The area additionally sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.8 ± 2.4 years. A median household income of $105,231 predicts 80.3 years — 4.6 years above.

    Ranked #103 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.8 ± 2.4 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.7 years — 4.1 years above them.

    Ranked #316 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.8%30.7–36.8
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.6–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.1%12.0–14.2
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Depression among adults23.0%20.1–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.5–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%36.6–43.7
Obesity among adults31.3%26.7–36.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.9–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.5–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.3–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.9–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%88.1–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.7%71.4–78.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.6%68.9–74.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%70.0–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.8–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.4%7.9–10.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.5%12.9–18.2
Short sleep duration among adults28.2%24.5–32.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.3–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.8%12.2–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.1–12.9
Any disability among adults29.0%25.5–32.3
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate90.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population6.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households71.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+34.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age56.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$105,231$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$670,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,896$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.8 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 84.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured