Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98815

in Cashmere, WashingtonPopulation 7,830

57.34/ 100

Ranked #6,948 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #170 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #7 of 22 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

0.86%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Park land

29.3%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.8%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

53.4 mi

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

25.4 days/year

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Cashmere, Washington (ZIP 98815) lands in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,948th) and the top 29% of Washington (170th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, park land lies in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 8.2% nationally, transit registers in the top 10.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 10.9% nationally. Recreation settles in the top 11.2% nationally, and modeled obesity is in the bottom 14.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled fine-particle sits in the top 7.4% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 11.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 98821, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.5%23.8–29.2
High blood pressure among adults31.1%27.9–34.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Depression among adults25.0%21.8–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.4–38.4
Obesity among adults29.0%24.2–34.0
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.6%9.5–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.5–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.9%68.6–75.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.9%67.1–74.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.3–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%61.3–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.9%60.6–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.5%62.0–75.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.6–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.7–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%16.9–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults28.8%24.5–33.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.3%16.0–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.1–16.5
Any disability among adults29.9%26.4–33.4
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.9–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate79.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households43.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$88,108$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$554,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,116$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.52 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured