Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83455

in Victor, IdahoPopulation 6,173

62.31/ 100

Ranked #3,334 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.4%)

Ranked #6 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 2.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

26.3%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

3.1 days/year

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

28.1 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.8%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.1%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

25.5 mi

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

2.0%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Victor, Idaho (ZIP 83455), in overall standing, comes out in the top 10.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,334th) and the top 2.3% of Idaho (6th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 1.5% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, high cholesterol registers in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the bottom 3.7% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and stroke registers in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a community health center is in the top 5.5% nationally, and modeled nitrate lies in the top 5.7% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 83414, less than a tenth of a mile away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.4 ± 2.6 years. A median household income of $121,964 predicts 80.9 years — 4.5 years above.

    Ranked #106 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.4 ± 2.6 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.1 years — 4.3 years above them.

    Ranked #272 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%18.8–24.7
High blood pressure among adults26.1%22.4–29.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.8–5.2
Depression among adults21.1%17.9–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.6%6.5–8.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.8%25.8–33.9
Obesity among adults31.3%24.2–38.7
Stroke among adults2.2%2.0–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.0–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.4–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.7%62.7–70.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.9%68.5–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.6–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.7%53.5–63.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.7%69.5–75.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.7%63.3–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.2–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.0%8.2–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.1%13.8–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%24.6–36.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.3%11.3–15.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.3–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.2–14.7
Any disability among adults26.0%22.0–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Mobility disability among adults9.7%8.2–11.3
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.0%14.9–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.8–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.8–7.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.4–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Loneliness among adults26.3%21.6–31.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6418.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription98.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate82.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population10.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households49.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$121,964$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$789,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,410$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.4 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 85.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured