Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98528

in Belfair, WashingtonPopulation 11,940

53.78/ 100

Ranked #10,983 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #286 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

8.6 days/year

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.7%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

58.4%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Belfair, Washington (ZIP 98528), overall, ranks in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,983rd) and the top 49% of Washington (286th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled humid heat is in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 8.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover lies in the top 15% nationally, and energy burden stands in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, crowded housing rests in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled pfas resides in the top 8.6% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the top 16% nationally.

Defined simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 98312, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.8–32.4
High blood pressure among adults33.2%30.1–36.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Depression among adults26.5%23.4–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%33.4–40.4
Obesity among adults35.1%30.2–40.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.3–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.8–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%70.1–76.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.9%67.5–74.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.9–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%64.8–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%63.9–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.8%62.4–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.9–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%16.4–22.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%27.4–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%16.4–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.9–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%13.2–16.3
Any disability among adults30.8%27.4–34.3
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.4
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.4
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.4–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households62.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$91,058$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$430,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,216$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured