Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98675

in Yacolt, WashingtonPopulation 7,305

55.15/ 100

Ranked #9,275 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #228 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #55 of 120 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.9%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.9 days/year

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.5%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.1%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Yacolt, Washington (ZIP 98675), by its composite score, sits in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,275th) and the top 39% of Washington (228th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled pfas resides in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and humid heat is in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the top 8.6% nationally, and energy burden stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and high cholesterol settles in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Pulling the other way, PFOA in drinking water sits at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water lies at the national maximum, and PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum. Modeled disaster risk resides in the top 9.3% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 98604, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%22.4–26.3
High blood pressure among adults29.5%27.3–31.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.1
Depression among adults28.2%25.8–30.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.1%29.8–34.4
Obesity among adults35.3%31.9–38.9
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.2%6.6–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.1–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.5%66.9–72.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.6%63.9–69.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.2%80.4–84.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%62.4–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.9–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%67.8–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%16.6–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%10.3–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%16.2–20.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%28.5–34.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.6–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.6–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%13.1–16.3
Any disability among adults27.5%24.9–30.2
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.6–12.2
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age32.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$99,877$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$560,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,422$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured