Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98584

in Shelton, WashingtonPopulation 40,606

48.47/ 100

Ranked #18,339 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #439 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.4%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Shelton, Washington (ZIP 98584) comes out in the bottom 43% nationally (18,339th) and the bottom 24% of Washington (439th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 13.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled radon sits in the bottom 20% nationally, and mental-health providers settles in the top 19% nationally. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 3.0% nationally, and mammography stands in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the top 9.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 98349, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.0 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $78,610 predicts 79.1 years — 1.1 years below.

    Ranked #1,493 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 42.1 — 53 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,244 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%29.0–34.6
High blood pressure among adults36.3%33.2–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.4–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Depression among adults26.2%23.2–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%11.0–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.9–41.9
Obesity among adults37.2%32.3–42.8
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.7–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%9.3–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%71.0–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.0%67.5–74.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.5–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%62.0–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.1%55.7–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.4%60.0–74.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.9–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.9–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.8–26.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%29.0–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%20.5–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.4–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.9–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.9–18.1
Any disability among adults35.0%31.7–38.6
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6412.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)11.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription90.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population8.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households55.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+20.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$78,610$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$393,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,315$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured