Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98070

in Vashon, WashingtonPopulation 9,934

62.41/ 100

Ranked #3,287 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.3%)

Ranked #72 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 12.4%)

Ranked #66 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

26.9%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.8%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

67.1%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.9 days/year

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.4%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.1%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.7%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Vashon, Washington (ZIP 98070) ranks in the top 10.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,287th) and the top 12.4% of Washington (72nd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and obesity lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and tooth loss settles in the bottom 5.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas rests in the top 5.3% nationally, disaster risk lands in the top 5.7% nationally, and expected annual loss settles in the top 8.3% nationally. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 98136, about 2.2 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.2 ± 3.6 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.4 years — 4.8 years above them.

    Ranked #177 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%28.2–32.0
High blood pressure among adults35.3%33.3–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%11.0–12.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.7–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
Depression among adults25.3%23.5–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%39.6–43.6
Obesity among adults24.8%22.5–27.3
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.1%5.1–7.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.3–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%74.1–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%74.5–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.7–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%69.9–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.8%72.1–75.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%72.0–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.8–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.6%6.3–9.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.9%12.1–15.9
Short sleep duration among adults26.9%24.9–28.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%11.9–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.4–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Any disability among adults24.4%22.1–26.8
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults5.7%4.9–6.4
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.7
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate82.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+29.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age52.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$120,571$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$790,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,670$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.2 yr ± 1.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.85 years of 84.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured