Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88231

in Eunice, New MexicoPopulation 3,255

36.93/ 100

Ranked #28,567 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.0%)

Ranked #278 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

79.8 per million

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

50.5%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.3%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

20.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

64.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

31.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

72 days/year

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

22.5%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By the composite health measure, Eunice, New Mexico (ZIP 88231) ranks in the bottom 11.0% nationally (28,567th) and the bottom 18% of New Mexico (278th).

continue reading

On the ground, a handful of readings define this area: modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and colon screening registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and uninsured stands in the top 4.0% nationally. Fatal road crashes lies in the top 1.8% nationally, modeled arsenic lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled extreme heat sits in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 7.2% nationally, utility shutoff settles in the top 6.0% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the top 6.1% nationally.

To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 79714, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.6%22.6–28.7
High blood pressure among adults35.9%31.9–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.2–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.5–9.9
Depression among adults24.3%20.6–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%30.6–39.1
Obesity among adults39.5%32.5–46.7
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%14.8–21.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.7%17.1–24.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.9%68.4–75.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults65.8%61.3–70.4
Cholesterol screening among adults78.6%75.7–81.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.5%45.1–55.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.3%46.4–54.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.3%54.2–71.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.5–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.0–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.3%27.3–37.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%28.4–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.4%25.9–33.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.2–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%16.0–20.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.6–22.7
Any disability among adults40.2%35.3–45.1
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.5–21.3
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.9%23.1–31.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.0%25.1–33.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.7%22.0–29.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.5%19.6–25.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.9–16.8
Loneliness among adults37.0%32.0–42.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6420.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)29.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle10.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription75.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate73.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population11.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households51.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$51,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$128,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$721$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 2.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.23 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured