ZIP code
86025
in Holbrook, ArizonaPopulation 5,226
40.82/ 100
Ranked #26,177 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranked #300 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 24%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Colon-cancer screening
50.9%
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST21stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Mammography
63.5%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST23rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Fatal road crashes
67 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
23.3 mi
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
22.8 mi
in the top 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
82.5 mi
in the top 4.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Walkability
1.8 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 6.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST13thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
19.5 per million
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST27thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.6%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST81stUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Elder-services access
0.19 per 1,000 residents
in the top 7.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Holbrook, Arizona (ZIP 86025) lands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,177th) and the bottom 24% of Arizona (300th).
The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and mammography resides in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Fatal road crashes lands in the top 1.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 2.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits in the top 4.0% nationally, walkability rests in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 7.4% nationally. Better still, distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 4.9% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and elder services lies in the top 7.7% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 85924, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Risk Behavior
healthier than 62%
11%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 60%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 36%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 13%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 36%
8%
Disability
healthier than 16%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 44%
21%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 20%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 23%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 39%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 17%
8%
Disability
healthier than 27%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85924
Arizonashares a border
Score 44.76
Closest healthier
85928
Arizonashares a border
Score 49.20
Similar health profile
83335
Idaho96% similar profile
Score 43.54
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.3% | 24.9–29.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 37.4% | 34.4–40.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.8% | 7.1–8.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.1% | 11.7–14.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.5% | 6.8–8.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.3% | 8.3–10.2 |
| Depression among adults | 22.2% | 19.5–25.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.6% | 12.1–15.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.4% | 31.5–37.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 37.8% | 33.3–42.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 4.1–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 19.5% | 16.6–22.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.6% | 12.6–16.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 72.7% | 70.0–75.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 69.5% | 66.2–72.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 80.1% | 77.9–82.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 50.9% | 46.4–55.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.6% | 49.3–55.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 63.5% | 56.4–70.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.0% | 10.9–15.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.5% | 15.3–19.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.8% | 22.6–29.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.9% | 31.4–40.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.8% | 22.2–27.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.0% | 17.1–20.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.5% | 14.8–18.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.2% | 17.2–21.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.7% | 34.1–41.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.7% | 8.7–10.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.9% | 9.8–12.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.9% | 15.0–18.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 5.1–6.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.5% | 7.7–9.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 31.0% | 27.9–34.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.2% | 21.6–27.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 19.0% | 16.7–21.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.9% | 15.9–20.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.7% | 12.3–15.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.2% | 29.7–37.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.9% | 11.4–14.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 18.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 17.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 12.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 75.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 63.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 5.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 47.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 14.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 35.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $56,919 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $163,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | $910 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.2 yr ± 1.25 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured