Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98948

in Toppenish, WashingtonPopulation 12,638

39.68/ 100

Ranked #26,963 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #569 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranked #20 of 21 Yakima, WA ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

27.4%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.4%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.4%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.2%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

16.4%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.6%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

4.9%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

41.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Toppenish, Washington (ZIP 98948) lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,963rd) and the bottom 2.1% of Washington (569th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled uninsured settles in the top 1.7% nationally, colon screening is in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lands in the top 3.1% nationally, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 1.4% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and mammography registers in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Modeled nitrate resides in the top 4.2% nationally. On the better side, distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

Put simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. On the overall standing, ZIP 98932, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Yakima, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.7%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.5 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $65,759 predicts 78.4 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #3,969 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.5 ± 1.7 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.4 years — 4.8 years below them.

    Ranked #3,341 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.9%20.0–24.0
High blood pressure among adults33.3%30.6–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Depression among adults22.0%19.5–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%14.2–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.4–37.0
Obesity among adults43.9%39.5–48.4
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.6%18.4–25.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years27.4%23.7–30.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.4%66.4–72.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.2%62.8–69.5
Cholesterol screening among adults75.4%72.9–78.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.4%47.2–55.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.2%45.0–51.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.4%59.9–72.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.8–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%31.2–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%29.6–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.4%31.2–37.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.6–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%16.4–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.6%19.3–23.7
Any disability among adults39.7%36.1–43.3
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Independent living disability among adults12.2%10.9–13.5
Mobility disability among adults18.7%16.7–20.6
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Vision disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6430.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)35.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)9.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate58.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)16.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population29.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households38.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+11.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age28.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$65,759$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$232,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$992$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured