Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88220

in Carlsbad, New MexicoPopulation 39,828

48.00/ 100

Ranked #18,914 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #152 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

88.4 days/year

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.7 per million

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.4%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST44th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.6%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

172 units

in the top 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.2%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

32.1%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

3.3%

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Carlsbad, New Mexico (ZIP 88220) lands in the bottom 41% nationally (18,914th) and the top 45% of New Mexico (152nd).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Park land lies in the top 10.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 2.1% nationally, extreme heat registers in the top 3.5% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening rests in the bottom 8.1% nationally, uninsured is in the top 8.1% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the top 11.3% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 12.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 88210, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $78,162 predicts 79.1 years — 4.7 years below.

    Ranked #5,433 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.1 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.7 years — 4.3 years below them.

    Ranked #3,140 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.7 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #1,484 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.0–25.7
High blood pressure among adults32.1%28.4–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Depression among adults23.2%19.7–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%29.3–37.4
Obesity among adults39.5%32.4–46.8
Stroke among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.6–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.6%14.5–18.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.5%68.0–74.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.1%61.5–70.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.7%79.5–83.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.4%52.2–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.8%55.1–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.5%61.3–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.6–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%11.7–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%22.5–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%33.2–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%20.0–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.1–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.5–18.2
Any disability among adults33.1%29.1–37.5
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.2–15.8
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.3–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%16.9–22.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.3–17.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Loneliness among adults34.7%30.0–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.0–11.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)17.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate74.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population8.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households53.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age38.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$78,162$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$206,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,241$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured