Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79323

in Denver City, TexasPopulation 7,485

48.17/ 100

Ranked #18,717 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #670 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

27.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

49%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.31 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

19.6%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.4%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST22nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.8%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

61.8 days/year

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Denver City, Texas (ZIP 79323) ranks in the bottom 42% nationally (18,717th) and the top 36% of Texas (670th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.7% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled nitrate settles in the top 2.2% nationally, and colon screening resides in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and extreme heat rests in the top 7.1% nationally. More encouragingly, mental-health providers stands in the top 2.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 9.2% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 88242, about 3.5 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $87,321 predicts 79.5 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,784 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.3–24.4
High blood pressure among adults32.5%29.0–36.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.9–6.4
Depression among adults20.7%17.8–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%12.0–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.2–40.0
Obesity among adults37.2%29.9–45.3
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.2–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years27.2%23.3–31.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.0%71.1–76.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.9%68.0–75.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.7–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.4%51.2–61.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.2%43.7–50.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.7%59.4–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.4–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%10.8–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%27.4–37.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%32.7–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.0–28.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.2–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.7–18.8
Any disability among adults34.5%30.2–38.9
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.6–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6429.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)30.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate62.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population24.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households35.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+10.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age25.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$87,321$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$193,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$924$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured