Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85035

in Phoenix, ArizonaPopulation 53,424

40.72/ 100

Ranked #26,246 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #301 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #141 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 11.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

30.8%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

100%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

45.2%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

135.5 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

16.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.6%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25.8%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.5%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 85035, one of several in Phoenix, Arizona stands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,246th) and the bottom 24% of Arizona (301st).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 0.03% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 0.3% nationally. Crowded housing resides in the top 1.8% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 2.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity sits in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity resides in the top 3.5% nationally, and vision disability stands in the top 6.0% nationally. On the encouraging side, floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 85033, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 2.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 86.0 — 84 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,477 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.5%16.1–18.9
High blood pressure among adults27.8%25.8–29.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Depression among adults18.2%16.3–20.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.4–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.5%30.3–34.7
Obesity among adults36.8%33.1–40.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.9%18.2–24.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years30.8%27.8–33.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.3%61.8–66.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.1%64.2–69.9
Cholesterol screening among adults77.0%74.8–79.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years45.2%41.9–48.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.4%38.7–44.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%64.3–74.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.9–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.7–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%28.8–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%37.5–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.0%26.8–31.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.6–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.4–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.4%18.6–22.0
Any disability among adults37.1%34.4–39.7
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.9–16.5
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
Vision disability among adults9.5%8.8–10.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.7%30.2–35.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.9%33.1–38.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.8%23.4–28.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.8%23.5–28.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.6–18.7
Loneliness among adults38.1%35.4–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.6%12.3–15.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6432.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)33.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate46.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)16.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population31.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households31.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+6.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age27.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$60,440$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$275,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,481$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured