ZIP code
86047
in Winslow, ArizonaPopulation 13,899
35.25/ 100
Ranked #29,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)
Ranked #336 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 14.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
58.6%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST13thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
47%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST14thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
30.7%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
10.4%
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
14.1%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
17.3%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
20.9%
in the top 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
15.9%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
30.3%
in the top 5.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
73.3 mi
in the top 6.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST82ndUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Winslow, Arizona (ZIP 86047) ranks in the bottom 8.7% nationally (29,290th) and the bottom 14.8% of Arizona (336th).
Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled mammography is in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and colon screening settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 2.8% nationally, and vision disability registers in the top 4.1% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 2.5% nationally, modeled transportation stands in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the top 5.7% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the top 5.9% nationally. More encouragingly, distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.
Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Close by, ZIP 85928, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 72%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 70%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 21%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 1%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 34%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 31%
8%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 78%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 45%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 12%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 21%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 15%
8%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 75.0 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $54,441 predicts 77.7 years — 2.7 years below.
Ranked #3,678 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Below its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 75.0 ± 1.4 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.1 years — 3.0 years below them.
Ranked #2,417 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 74.3; chronic-disease standing 21.3 — 53 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #2,271 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85928
Arizonashares a border
Score 49.20
Closest healthier
85931
Arizonashares a border
Score 61.12
Similar health profile
87413
New Mexico98% similar profile
Score 37.86
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.3% | 25.2–29.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 38.1% | 35.4–41.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.2% | 6.6–7.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.7% | 12.4–15.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.0% | 7.3–8.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.1% | 9.2–11.1 |
| Depression among adults | 21.7% | 19.3–24.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.2% | 13.8–16.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.7% | 31.0–36.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.0% | 34.6–43.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.0% | 4.7–5.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 30.7% | 27.0–34.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 16.8% | 14.7–18.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 71.9% | 69.3–74.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.8% | 65.5–72.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 78.2% | 76.0–80.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 47.0% | 42.6–51.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 45.5% | 42.3–48.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 58.6% | 51.4–65.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.9% | 11.0–15.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.3% | 18.3–22.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.1% | 25.1–31.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.8% | 34.4–43.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 28.3% | 25.9–30.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.0% | 18.1–21.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.0% | 16.4–19.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.9% | 19.0–23.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 40.9% | 37.8–44.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.8% | 9.9–11.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.6% | 11.5–13.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.1% | 17.5–21.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.9–6.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.7–11.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 33.6% | 30.3–37.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 30.3% | 27.4–33.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 24.2% | 21.7–26.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.7% | 19.3–24.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 17.3% | 15.6–19.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.5% | 31.0–38.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 15.9% | 14.2–17.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 29.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 18.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 17.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 9.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 9.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 6.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 60.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 14.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 35.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 12.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 34.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $54,441 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $129,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | $957 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.0 yr ± 0.73 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured