Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85901

in Show Low, ArizonaPopulation 19,533

53.96/ 100

Ranked #10,753 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #143 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

55.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

27.3 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

105.8 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.8%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST38th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.4 days/year

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.5 per million

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

308 units

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Show Low, Arizona (ZIP 85901) ranks in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,753rd) and the top 36% of Arizona (143rd).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: park land is in the top 1.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally, physicians stands in the top 7.7% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 8.0% nationally. Set against that, distance to an emergency room lands in the top 2.4% nationally, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the bottom 5.1% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Close by, ZIP 85935, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.6 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $59,779 predicts 78.0 years — 1.6 years above.

    Ranked #1,224 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 96.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 30.8 — 66 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,333 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%29.5–34.7
High blood pressure among adults40.2%37.2–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.9–12.8
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.4–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Depression among adults20.9%18.5–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%35.9–42.0
Obesity among adults33.0%28.8–37.5
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.4–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%8.4–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%76.1–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.3%71.4–77.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.5–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%56.6–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.1–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.8%60.1–72.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%10.1–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%11.0–14.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.3%18.6–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.5%26.6–34.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%17.3–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.5–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.1–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.9–15.9
Any disability among adults33.0%30.0–36.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%9.2–11.2
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.8–17.2
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%22.5–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.2–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Loneliness among adults28.9%25.8–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate74.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households69.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+29.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age48.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$59,779$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$280,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,071$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured