Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85337

in Gila Bend, ArizonaPopulation 2,041

30.90/ 100

Ranked #30,568 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)

Ranked #343 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 13.0%)

Ranked #155 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

30%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

47.7%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

117.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.2%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

125.5 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

49.3%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

45.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

32.3 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Gila Bend, Arizona (ZIP 85337) sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally (30,568th) and the bottom 13.0% of Arizona (343rd).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled uninsured stands in the top 1.1% nationally, vision disability resides in the top 1.5% nationally, and colon screening sits in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Fatal road crashes stands in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled extreme heat sits in the top 0.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the top 1.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits in the top 1.4% nationally. On the better side, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 1.1% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, fatal road crashes runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 85139, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%24.3–28.1
High blood pressure among adults36.8%34.4–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.7–6.8
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Depression among adults19.6%17.6–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%16.5–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%37.0–42.0
Obesity among adults39.5%35.4–43.6
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.7%22.7–29.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years30.0%25.9–34.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.5%70.0–74.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.4%67.6–73.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.1%76.7–81.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years47.7%44.2–51.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.3%36.7–42.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.1%59.5–70.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%18.0–22.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.0%33.3–40.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.8%37.3–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.2%32.8–39.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.2–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%17.5–21.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.3%20.0–24.6
Any disability among adults44.8%41.4–48.2
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Independent living disability among adults13.2%11.8–14.6
Mobility disability among adults23.2%21.0–25.4
Self-care disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Vision disability among adults12.7%11.4–13.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.4%29.5–35.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.0%36.1–44.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults32.3%28.4–36.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.4%23.5–29.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.2%17.1–21.3
Loneliness among adults36.5%33.6–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.5–17.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6442.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)40.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription80.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate62.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population24.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households62.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age42.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$55,365$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$116,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,069$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured