Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79343

in Lorenzo, TexasPopulation 1,233

38.95/ 100

Ranked #27,428 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.5%)

Ranked #1,545 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #28 of 36 Lubbock, TX ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

25.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

14.0%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.1%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.7%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

29.6%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

40.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Lorenzo, Texas (ZIP 79343) sits in the bottom 14.5% nationally (27,428th) and the bottom 17% of Texas (1,545th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled uninsured rests in the top 2.0% nationally, nitrate settles in the top 2.7% nationally, and colon screening lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 5.5% nationally, arsenic settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 5.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 6.6% nationally. On the stronger side, elder services lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 3.4% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 79250, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lubbock, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.9%24.8–30.9
High blood pressure among adults40.4%36.3–44.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Depression among adults22.3%19.3–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%16.0–20.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%36.1–44.1
Obesity among adults41.5%33.6–49.6
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.3%17.1–23.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years25.9%22.2–29.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.5–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%71.0–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%81.8–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.1%49.2–58.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.7%41.5–48.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.7%60.4–76.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.2–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%14.7–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.1%32.8–42.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%33.3–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.5%27.9–35.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.2–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%15.9–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.5–20.9
Any disability among adults40.5%35.7–44.8
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Mobility disability among adults21.7%19.1–24.4
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Vision disability among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6427.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)20.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population4.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$58,906$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$119,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$681$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured