Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85333

in Dateland, ArizonaPopulation 442

50.96/ 100

Ranked #14,910 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #185 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #101 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

125.9 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

42.5 mi

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

46.4 mi

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

45.6%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

44.5%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

5.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Dateland, Arizona (ZIP 85333) ranks in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,910th) and the top 47% of Arizona (185th).

continue reading

Plainly stated, a few measures mark out this area: modeled extreme heat rests in the top 0.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home is in the top 0.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands in the top 0.9% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic lies in the top 1.2% nationally, slow internet speeds resides in the top 2.1% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 6.0% nationally, and tree cover sits at the national minimum. Better still, modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 85396, about 24 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.6%21.4–25.8
High blood pressure among adults33.0%30.1–35.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Depression among adults17.3%15.2–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.3–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%33.5–39.7
Obesity among adults34.0%29.5–38.6
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%10.2–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.4%14.8–22.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%73.0–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%71.0–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.2–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.4%54.9–63.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.4%51.3–57.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%68.6–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.8–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%9.2–12.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%20.1–26.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%29.7–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.5–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.4–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.0–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.7–16.4
Any disability among adults31.1%27.6–34.8
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.3–16.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.1%22.8–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.1–21.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.7–14.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.6–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.4
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.9–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6431.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)29.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)8.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle8.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription98.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate70.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population24.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households73.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+30.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age57.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$39,722$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$206,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,054$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured