Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85253

in Paradise Valley, ArizonaPopulation 17,904

67.95/ 100

Ranked #1,028 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.3%)

Ranked #4 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 1.1%)

Ranked #4 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$184,979

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

135.2 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

4.7%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.0%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.4%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.1%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

16.4%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.86 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Paradise Valley, Arizona (ZIP 85253) comes out in the top 3.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,028th) and the top 1.1% of Arizona (4th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income settles in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Dental providers lands in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled loneliness is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and outpatient lies in the top 2.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled extreme heat sits in the top 0.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 2.4% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 85259, about 3.9 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.8 ± 1.6 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 5.0 years above them.

    Ranked #150 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.9–31.2
High blood pressure among adults34.7%32.2–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.2%12.3–14.2
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–5.9
Depression among adults17.0%15.3–18.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.4%39.7–45.1
Obesity among adults25.3%22.2–28.6
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.5%5.5–7.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.2–5.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.4–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%77.5–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.6–92.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%68.3–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.0%70.8–75.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%75.5–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.7%5.7–7.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.3%12.5–16.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.0%26.1–32.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.5%11.2–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Frequent physical distress among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Any disability among adults24.6%22.3–26.7
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–8.9
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.5
Mobility disability among adults11.2%9.9–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%17.1–20.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.4–4.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Loneliness among adults26.4%24.2–28.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)1.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)71.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription96.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate84.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population15.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households63.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+28.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age51.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$184,979$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$2,000,001$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$2,018$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured