Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78545

in Falcon Heights, TexasPopulation 392

36.64/ 100

Ranked #28,694 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.6%)

Ranked #1,668 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 10.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

38.9%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

38.7%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

135.1 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

50.4%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

197.1 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.9%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

52.6%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Falcon Heights, Texas (ZIP 78545), overall, ranks in the bottom 10.6% nationally (28,694th) and the bottom 10.8% of Texas (1,668th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled uninsured lies in the top 0.3% nationally, vision disability stands in the top 0.9% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers in the top 0.3% nationally, colon screening resides in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the top 1.8% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 2.6% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 1.8% nationally. On the better side, housing-cost burden lies at the national minimum.

Defined simply, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 78591, about 25 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

healthier than 98%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

healthier than 97%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.7–28.1
High blood pressure among adults39.4%35.9–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Depression among adults20.2%17.5–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.9%19.7–24.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.4–43.7
Obesity among adults44.0%36.8–51.6
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%16.4–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years38.9%34.3–43.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.8–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%70.2–76.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.2%80.0–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.4%45.6–55.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.8%37.6–44.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.1%60.4–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%11.1–15.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults45.9%40.8–51.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%33.5–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults38.7%34.8–42.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.8–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults19.7%17.7–21.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%18.2–22.9
Any disability among adults44.2%39.7–48.8
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.3
Independent living disability among adults12.7%11.2–14.2
Mobility disability among adults24.7%22.1–27.4
Self-care disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Vision disability among adults13.8%12.4–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)50.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription52.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population21.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households18.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+36.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age52.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$24,550$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 1.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.43 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured