Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98424

in Fife, WashingtonPopulation 11,816

52.15/ 100

Ranked #13,251 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #340 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #142 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (bottom 14.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4 days/year

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

76.4%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

7.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.1%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.4%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.3%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fife, Washington (ZIP 98424), on the composite measure, lands in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,251st) and the bottom 41% of Washington (340th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 2.4% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and mental-health providers lies in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled energy burden settles in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and transit stands in the top 6.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk is in the top 0.6% nationally, and pfas rests in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 4.1% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 4.9% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 5.1% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 98354, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 19.5; chronic-disease standing 88.3 — 69 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,286 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.9%19.5–22.4
High blood pressure among adults28.9%27.0–30.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.4
Current asthma among adults11.0%10.0–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Depression among adults26.0%23.8–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.1%30.1–34.1
Obesity among adults37.6%34.5–40.5
Stroke among adults2.5%2.4–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.7–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.6–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.7%62.1–67.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.8%65.2–70.1
Cholesterol screening among adults80.1%78.2–81.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.4%56.5–62.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%58.9–63.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%66.5–75.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%15.5–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%18.0–22.0
Short sleep duration among adults40.6%37.7–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%16.3–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.8–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%12.0–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%15.3–18.3
Any disability among adults30.1%27.8–32.3
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.6
Self-care disability among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate49.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population23.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households33.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+7.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age31.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$94,122$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$561,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,890$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured