Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99163

in Pullman, WashingtonPopulation 34,022

53.26/ 100

Ranked #11,710 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #303 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

23.5%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

19.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

5.4%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.1%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

6.4%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.8%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

34.7%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.6%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Pullman, Washington (ZIP 99163) ranks in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,710th) and the bottom 48% of Washington (303rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally. On the other hand, slow internet speeds resides in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Homeownership sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 99102, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults13.7%12.3–15.2
High blood pressure among adults19.9%17.7–22.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Depression among adults30.4%27.2–33.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened23.5%21.2–26.0
Obesity among adults28.5%24.3–32.9
Stroke among adults1.8%1.6–1.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.3–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%8.3–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure54.7%52.2–57.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults64.7%60.7–68.6
Cholesterol screening among adults66.2%63.3–69.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.2–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.4%54.3–60.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%68.2–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.2–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%8.4–11.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.7%15.0–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%26.7–35.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.4–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults24.0%21.6–26.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.5–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.0%19.6–24.4
Any disability among adults33.1%29.5–36.7
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Mobility disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)61.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)8.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle9.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate34.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population9.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+7.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age23.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$48,231$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$435,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,062$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured