Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83660

in Parma, IdahoPopulation 6,434

43.59/ 100

Ranked #23,809 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #232 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 13.5%)

Ranked #32 of 38 Boise City, ID ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

62%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

40.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.8%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

67.5 mi

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.5%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

44.6 days/year

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Parma, Idaho (ZIP 83660) ranks in the bottom 26% nationally (23,809th) and the bottom 13.5% of Idaho (232nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled mammography lands in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the top 7.0% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and extreme heat settles in the top 10.8% nationally. Better still, distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 7.0% nationally, modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and grocery lands in the top 10.7% nationally.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 83607, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boise City, ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%27.2–32.2
High blood pressure among adults35.7%33.0–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.7–9.8
Depression among adults23.4%21.0–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%12.0–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%34.1–40.1
Obesity among adults36.6%32.6–40.8
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.4–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.6%11.8–15.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.3%69.4–75.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%71.2–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults81.2%79.2–83.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.5%53.7–61.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.2%56.2–62.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years62.0%55.6–67.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.8–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%24.8–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%31.9–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%20.2–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.7–20.6
Any disability among adults41.4%37.9–45.0
Hearing disability among adults11.4%10.3–12.6
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Mobility disability among adults19.1%17.0–21.3
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.9–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.3–19.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.5–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Loneliness among adults28.3%25.2–31.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6420.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)15.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate71.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households42.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+18.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$63,653$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$417,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$997$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured