Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

83619

in Fruitland, IdahoPopulation 8,823

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

47.42/ 100

Ranked #19,654 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #188 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

45.8%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.2%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.7%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

76.7 mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST52nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.7%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

42.8 days/year

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Fruitland, Idaho (ZIP 83619) lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,654th) and the bottom 30% of Idaho (188th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 5.6% nationally. Fiber broadband rests in the top 8.5% nationally, and outpatient is in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 10.1% nationally. On the other hand, modeled arsenic settles in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 5.3% nationally, and crowded housing resides in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the top 7.5% nationally, and mammography registers in the bottom 8.3% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 83655, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.0–32.4
High blood pressure among adults35.9%31.9–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.4–9.8
Depression among adults22.5%19.1–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.1–39.4
Obesity among adults31.6%25.3–38.3
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.6–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%11.5–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.6–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%70.1–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults80.7%78.4–82.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%56.2–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.5%59.8–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.3%60.2–75.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.2–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%12.1–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%23.0–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.1%24.8–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.7%18.9–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.3–19.5
Any disability among adults37.7%33.4–42.3
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.0–20.8
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.8–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.5–19.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.9–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.3–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.1
Loneliness among adults27.2%22.8–31.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)12.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate75.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households50.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$66,267$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$348,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$780$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.61 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured