Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83628

in Homedale, IdahoPopulation 5,006

41.30/ 100

Ranked #25,809 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #258 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)

Ranked #37 of 38 Boise City, ID ZIPs (bottom 2.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

59.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

62.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.2%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.2%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

61.8 mi

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Homedale, Idaho (ZIP 83628) lands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,809th) and the bottom 3.8% of Idaho (258th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled arsenic lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and mammography resides in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and tree cover registers at the national minimum. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 5.0% nationally, uninsured rests in the top 6.4% nationally, and hearing disability is in the top 7.5% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 8.1% nationally. Better still, grocery settles in the top 7.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 8.3% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 83639, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boise City, ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%25.8–32.6
High blood pressure among adults35.2%31.1–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Depression among adults22.4%19.0–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.5–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%30.7–39.3
Obesity among adults34.2%26.9–42.1
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%16.9–24.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.1%15.6–21.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.2%68.8–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.6%68.6–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults78.2%75.7–80.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.2%49.8–60.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.5%52.5–60.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years62.1%52.8–71.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.2–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%14.1–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.3%26.5–36.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%30.5–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.2–28.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.5–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.1–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.8%17.6–22.3
Any disability among adults41.4%36.7–46.5
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.4–22.6
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.2–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.8%18.4–25.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.4–18.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.6–18.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.6–12.6
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.1–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.7–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6426.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)18.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate75.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population8.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households51.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age35.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$68,854$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$323,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,059$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.47 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured