ZIP code
83632
in Indian Valley, IdahoPopulation 704
43.55/ 100
Ranked #23,857 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)
Ranked #233 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 13.1%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
14.4%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
35.2 mi
in the top 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST90thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Mammography
64.8%
in the bottom 2.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST18thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
22.6 mi
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.1%
in the bottom 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST26thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
22.8 mi
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.6%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
11.7%
in the bottom 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
5.4%
in the top 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.5%
in the top 8.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Indian Valley, Idaho (ZIP 83632) stands in the bottom 26% nationally (23,857th) and the bottom 13.1% of Idaho (233rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled hearing disability lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests in the top 2.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lands in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 6.0% nationally, energy burden rests in the top 5.6% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 8.1% nationally. On the encouraging side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally.
For clarity, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 83610, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 80%
11%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 96%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 59%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 13%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 10%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 27%
13%
Disability
healthier than 9%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 78%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 58%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 48%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 52%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
83610
Idahoshares a border
Score 49.21
Closest healthier
83612
Idahoshares a border
Score 44.58
Similar health profile
81138
Colorado97% similar profile
Score 41.09
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 37.4% | 33.6–41.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.2% | 37.8–47.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.8% | 10.5–13.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.4% | 10.0–13.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.6% | 9.2–12.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.4% | 9.5–13.6 |
| Depression among adults | 22.8% | 19.4–26.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.8% | 12.6–17.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.7% | 34.2–43.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.7% | 28.6–43.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.4% | 4.6–6.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.4% | 15.2–21.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.3% | 8.0–13.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.9% | 75.6–81.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.9% | 74.3–81.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.6% | 82.4–86.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.0% | 59.8–69.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 66.8% | 63.2–70.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 64.8% | 56.5–72.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.7% | 9.5–14.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.1% | 12.8–19.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 30.7% | 25.2–37.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.7% | 24.1–35.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.7% | 19.9–28.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.0% | 13.9–18.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.9% | 15.3–20.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.2% | 14.6–19.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.3% | 36.7–48.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 14.4% | 12.7–16.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.0% | 9.3–12.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.5% | 19.1–26.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 4.7–6.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.9–8.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.2% | 16.0–22.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.0% | 11.8–18.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 12.5% | 9.9–15.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 8.7–12.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.3% | 7.0–9.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.1% | 22.7–31.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 6.6–9.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ID median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 20.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 19.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274 |
| Households without a vehicle | 6.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275 |
| Homeownership rate | 65.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277 |
| Single-parent households | 50.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 58.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271 |
| Population 65+ | 21.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277 |
| Median age | 41.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273 |
| Median household income | $51,583 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252 |
| Median home value | $275,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247 |
| Median gross rent | $790 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $990 ($730–$1,495) n=192 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ID median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.9 yr ± 1.79 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.79 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured