Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83639

in Marsing, IdahoPopulation 3,311

43.06/ 100

Ranked #24,324 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #243 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 9.4%)

Ranked #34 of 38 Boise City, ID ZIPs (bottom 10.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

61.2%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

50.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.1%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.5%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.2%

in the top 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

32.6 days/year

in the top 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

14.4%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

19%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Marsing, Idaho (ZIP 83639) ranks in the bottom 24% nationally (24,324th) and the bottom 9.4% of Idaho (243rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled mammography resides in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and arsenic stands in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 5.1% nationally, and uninsured resides in the top 7.5% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 9.5% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes resides in the top 10.8% nationally, and modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 10.1% nationally. On the encouraging side, elder services sits in the top 4.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 83607, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boise City, ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%25.0–32.0
High blood pressure among adults33.7%29.6–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.3–9.9
Depression among adults22.6%19.1–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%30.6–39.6
Obesity among adults32.5%25.3–40.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.6%12.7–19.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.1%14.3–20.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.3%67.7–74.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.2%67.9–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.1%76.6–81.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.4%52.9–63.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.5%55.8–63.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years61.2%51.9–70.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.7–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.4–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%23.9–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%29.6–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.7%20.4–27.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.2–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.4–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%16.8–21.8
Any disability among adults39.4%34.4–44.8
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Mobility disability among adults18.3%15.7–21.0
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%19.9–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.0%15.9–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.5–15.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.2–16.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Loneliness among adults30.8%25.8–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6435.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)29.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription82.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate76.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population13.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households45.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$64,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$461,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$661$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 3.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.38 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured