Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83641

in Melba, IdahoPopulation 4,061

47.82/ 100

Ranked #19,154 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #185 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #29 of 38 Boise City, ID ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

65.1%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

30.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Park land

21.6%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.2%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.1%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Melba, Idaho (ZIP 83641) ranks in the bottom 40% nationally (19,154th) and the bottom 31% of Idaho (185th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: elder services settles in the top 5.1% nationally, and park land lies in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled pfas resides in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Against that, modeled mammography lands in the bottom 3.0% nationally, arsenic registers in the top 3.0% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 6.0% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 8.0% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes stands in the top 9.9% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the top 10.1% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 83607, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boise City, ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 48%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%27.2–31.8
High blood pressure among adults35.0%32.5–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.1–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.8–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Depression among adults22.9%20.7–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.4–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%34.1–39.7
Obesity among adults34.5%30.7–38.8
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.6–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%11.3–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.2%69.7–74.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%71.4–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults81.7%79.8–83.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.2%58.1–64.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.1%60.6–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.1%59.7–70.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.5–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.6–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%23.6–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%31.4–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%19.4–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.8–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.4–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%16.0–19.6
Any disability among adults39.4%36.2–42.9
Hearing disability among adults10.9%10.0–11.9
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Mobility disability among adults18.0%16.2–20.0
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%18.5–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.1–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.1–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.1–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Loneliness among adults28.6%25.7–31.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6416.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)15.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription83.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate81.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households57.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$84,730$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$425,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,107$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured