Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83427

in Iona, IdahoPopulation 2,931

59.62/ 100

Ranked #5,136 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #14 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 5.3%)

Ranked #3 of 20 Idaho Falls, ID ZIPs (top 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.7 days/year

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.0%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.8 per million

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.7%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Iona, Idaho (ZIP 83427) lands in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,136th) and the top 5.3% of Idaho (14th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum, and modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and diabetes settles in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 7.7% nationally, high blood pressure registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Fiber broadband stands in the top 8.9% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 7.6% nationally.

A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 83449, about 5.3 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.03%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.7%21.1–26.3
High blood pressure among adults27.8%24.7–30.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.1–6.2
Depression among adults25.2%22.1–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.0%6.8–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.7%28.4–35.1
Obesity among adults31.8%27.2–36.7
Stroke among adults2.6%2.2–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.0–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.5–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.3%64.6–71.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%70.7–77.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.1%79.3–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%61.0–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.1%69.2–74.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%65.4–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.8–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%7.9–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%14.8–22.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%31.5–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%11.8–17.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%13.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.6–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.4–17.2
Any disability among adults29.1%25.0–33.4
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.1–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.2–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.3–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%4.6–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%6.9–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.0–7.3
Loneliness among adults29.0%25.3–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.4–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate87.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households29.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+9.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age27.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$84,009$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$426,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,533$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.5 yr ± 1.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.48 years of 83.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured