Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83443

in Ririe, IdahoPopulation 1,364

58.16/ 100

Ranked #6,261 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #23 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 8.6%)

Ranked #5 of 20 Idaho Falls, ID ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

66 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.2 per million

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.2%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

11.4 mi

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.3 days/year

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Ririe, Idaho (ZIP 83443) lands in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,261st) and the top 8.6% of Idaho (23rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: elder services rests in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Civic stands in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the bottom 6.5% nationally. On the other hand, fatal road crashes lands in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled fine-particle registers in the top 7.6% nationally, and modeled radon sits in the top 9.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests in the top 8.7% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 83427, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.6%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.7%21.7–25.8
High blood pressure among adults28.2%25.9–30.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.3–8.5
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Depression among adults23.4%20.9–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.5%29.8–35.2
Obesity among adults31.0%26.8–35.4
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.5–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.0–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.3%67.6–72.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%70.4–76.2
Cholesterol screening among adults80.6%78.3–82.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%63.6–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.1%68.7–73.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%65.4–76.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.1–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.6–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.8%17.2–22.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%28.5–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%13.3–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.4–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.6–17.2
Any disability among adults30.9%27.9–34.3
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.5
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%17.0–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.8–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.5–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.9–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
Loneliness among adults29.7%26.4–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6416.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate75.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population6.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households32.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+7.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age30.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$65,590$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$247,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,168$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured