Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83236

in Firth, IdahoPopulation 1,840

54.23/ 100

Ranked #10,410 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #72 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.86 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.8 per million

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.2%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12 days/year

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.3%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

45 µg/L

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Firth, Idaho (ZIP 83236) places in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,410th) and the top 27% of Idaho (72nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 7.7% nationally, and humid heat lies in the bottom 8.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 12.2% nationally, and loneliness resides in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Poverty is in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Pulling the other way, walkability lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, modeled fine-particle stands in the top 7.8% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 11.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 15% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 83274, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.5–32.7
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.1–38.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.0–8.2
Depression among adults22.2%19.0–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%30.3–37.9
Obesity among adults37.8%31.7–43.3
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.2–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.2–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%69.9–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%71.7–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.7%80.3–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.7–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.7%66.4–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.4%61.1–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.1–16.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%10.7–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.0–26.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%26.6–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.3–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.4–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
Any disability among adults36.9%32.6–41.1
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.3–17.8
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.1–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.7–13.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.2–9.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.2–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.7–33.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6411.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription74.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate90.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households72.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+32.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$68,214$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$283,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$689$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured