Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77872

in North Zulch, TexasPopulation 2,026

47.60/ 100

Ranked #19,441 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #723 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.7%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

64.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

79.1 days/year

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

141.7 days/year

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

North Zulch, Texas (ZIP 77872), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 39% nationally (19,441st) and the top 39% of Texas (723rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled extreme heat lands in the top 5.0% nationally, and modeled humid heat is in the top 6.9% nationally. Crowded housing resides in the top 10.1% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 12.9% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 14.2% nationally. More positively, modeled pfas sits in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and lead in tap water settles in the bottom 13.1% nationally. Modeled radon registers in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 13.5% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 77808, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%24.7–31.6
High blood pressure among adults37.0%32.8–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.5–9.1
Depression among adults23.7%20.1–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.7–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.7–43.7
Obesity among adults33.3%25.7–42.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.1–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%10.7–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.3–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.4–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.5–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%59.0–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.7%54.2–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%62.5–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.2–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%11.9–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.9%22.2–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%29.5–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%17.5–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.3–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.3–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.0–17.3
Any disability among adults33.0%28.3–37.9
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–9.0
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.2–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.1–17.9
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6420.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate80.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households35.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$87,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$190,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$766$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 1.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.59 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured