Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76561

in Oglesby, TexasPopulation 996

49.52/ 100

Ranked #16,919 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #574 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #5 of 31 Killeen-Temple, TX ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.94%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

91.8 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.94 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oglesby, Texas (ZIP 76561), overall, ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (16,919th) and the top 31% of Texas (574th).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled extreme heat lies in the top 2.4% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 10.8% nationally, and walkability registers in the bottom 12.9% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 15% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and civic is in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and transportation noise lands in the bottom 12.2% nationally. Modeled radon lies in the bottom 7.8% nationally.

Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 76638, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Killeen-Temple, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.1–32.7
High blood pressure among adults36.5%32.5–40.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.5–8.9
Depression among adults23.6%20.4–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.0–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.4–42.5
Obesity among adults35.1%28.5–41.8
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.8–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.6%11.4–16.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.1–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%73.1–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.4–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%61.7–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.3–64.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%62.3–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%13.9–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.3–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.1%21.9–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%30.8–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.7–23.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.0–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
Any disability among adults32.6%28.3–37.2
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.1–17.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6423.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate81.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households66.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+22.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age47.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$60,357$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$165,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$948$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured