Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77471

in Rosenberg, TexasPopulation 45,325

47.57/ 100

Ranked #19,479 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #724 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #124 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

24.5%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

150.8 days/year

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.1%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST21st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

48.4 days/year

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 77471, one of several in Rosenberg, Texas lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,479th) and the top 39% of Texas (724th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled radon settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally, distance to an emergency room is in the bottom 13.2% nationally, and pharmacy sits in the top 13.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled uninsured lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and humid heat stands in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and colon screening registers in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides in the top 9.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 12.7% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 77406, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%18.9–24.3
High blood pressure among adults33.5%29.9–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Depression among adults20.2%17.3–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.7–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.2–39.3
Obesity among adults37.0%30.1–44.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.7–18.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years24.5%21.9–27.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.4%71.6–77.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.4%68.4–76.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%82.0–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%50.7–61.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.7%48.0–55.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%64.7–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.2–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%28.9–38.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%33.3–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.8%23.1–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.8–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%15.0–18.6
Any disability among adults32.5%28.6–36.8
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.4
Mobility disability among adults15.7%14.0–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Vision disability among adults7.6%7.0–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6424.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)13.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate58.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population20.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households37.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$73,186$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$237,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,364$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured