Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75457

in Mount Vernon, TexasPopulation 6,175

49.92/ 100

Ranked #16,363 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #541 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

63.4 days/year

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Mount Vernon, Texas (ZIP 75457) stands in the bottom 49% nationally (16,363rd) and the top 29% of Texas (541st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: grocery sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and lead in tap water resides at the national minimum. Modeled radon stands in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 13.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss stands in the bottom 21% nationally, and fiber broadband sits in the top 22% nationally. On the other side, modeled extreme heat resides in the top 6.9% nationally, humid heat stands in the top 10.3% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 13.9% nationally.

For clarity, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.7 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $83,916 predicts 79.4 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,692 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%23.8–30.4
High blood pressure among adults36.5%32.2–40.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Depression among adults23.7%20.1–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%33.6–42.7
Obesity among adults35.5%27.2–44.3
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.4%7.6–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.4%11.4–15.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.6–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%71.5–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.9–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.3–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.1–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.5%62.9–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%13.9–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.7–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.4–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%28.6–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%17.6–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%13.0–16.7
Any disability among adults32.2%28.0–36.8
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.0–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6421.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate80.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age37.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$83,916$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$249,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$928$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured