Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34679

in Aripeka, FloridaPopulation 141

45.47/ 100

Ranked #21,913 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #731 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #115 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 13.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

98.6%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

79.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

173 days/year

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

56.5%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.56%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US20th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Aripeka, Florida (ZIP 34679), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,913th) and the bottom 25% of Florida (731st).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: floodplain exposure rests in the top 0.3% nationally, PFOS in drinking water lies at the national maximum, and modeled pfas sits in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 2.1% nationally, home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum. More encouragingly, housing-cost burden lands at the national minimum, and poverty is at the national minimum. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 34667, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.8%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.1–32.1
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.7–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.1–10.7
Depression among adults22.4%19.2–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.9–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.3–43.6
Obesity among adults32.4%27.1–37.8
Stroke among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.0–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.5%10.4–17.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.3–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.1–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.4–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%63.2–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%52.1–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%66.6–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.3–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%13.1–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%22.0–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.7–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.2–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.3–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.4–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%13.3–18.5
Any disability among adults34.0%29.3–39.1
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.2–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.3%12.7–18.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)43.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription56.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate56.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured