Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74829

in Boley, OklahomaPopulation 1,678

33.17/ 100

Ranked #30,000 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranked #529 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.69 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

48.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

40.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.69 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

68%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

16.3%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.6%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST50th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.04%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Boley, Oklahoma (ZIP 74829), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 6.5% nationally (30,000th) and the bottom 17% of Oklahoma (529th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled obesity lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and poverty stands in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 5.3% nationally, mammography lies in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 7.7% nationally. More encouragingly, mental-health providers resides in the top 0.5% nationally, outpatient is in the top 4.0% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, mental-health providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 74833, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%23.4–30.3
High blood pressure among adults47.3%42.4–52.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.6–11.6
Depression among adults20.8%17.4–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%14.9–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%34.7–44.2
Obesity among adults48.3%39.6–57.5
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.7%20.8–29.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.3%12.4–19.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.5%70.9–77.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.0–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults80.7%77.7–83.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.4%48.9–60.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.1%36.4–44.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.6%58.3–75.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.4–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.8%21.7–30.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.4%31.8–43.5
Short sleep duration among adults42.5%34.9–50.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.4%24.4–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.4–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%16.8–22.5
Any disability among adults42.7%37.1–48.5
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.8
Mobility disability among adults20.5%17.8–23.6
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.1%26.6–35.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.5%23.1–32.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.9%20.9–29.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.1–23.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.6–15.5
Loneliness among adults33.3%28.0–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.9–18.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate40.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6419.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)17.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription68.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population4.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households48.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$29,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$81,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$488$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.3 yr ± 2.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.96 years of 84.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured