Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74026

in Davenport, OklahomaPopulation 814

41.66/ 100

Ranked #25,512 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #244 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #71 of 105 Oklahoma City, OK ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.6%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST50th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

54 days/year

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

59.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.4%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Davenport, Oklahoma (ZIP 74026), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,512th) and the top 38% of Oklahoma (244th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled mammography resides in the bottom 6.7% nationally, extreme heat lies in the top 8.3% nationally, and pfas settles in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled obesity stands in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 16% nationally. More positively, elder services sits in the top 0.7% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 13.2% nationally, and disaster risk resides in the bottom 16% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 74059, about 14 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oklahoma City, OK metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.3–33.9
High blood pressure among adults40.9%36.8–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
Depression among adults25.9%22.3–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.2–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.1–43.5
Obesity among adults43.4%36.3–51.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.9%13.0–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.7%8.7–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.4–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%73.7–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.5–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.4%56.1–66.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.3–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.6%58.8–75.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.2–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.1–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.6%27.6–37.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%30.6–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.1–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.5–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.6–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.4–21.2
Any disability among adults40.6%35.8–45.5
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.5
Mobility disability among adults18.3%15.9–20.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%22.1–30.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.1–21.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.5–17.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.5–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.0–10.7
Loneliness among adults34.0%29.0–40.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.5–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6421.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)13.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate76.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households43.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age34.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$56,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$97,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$1,022$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.48 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured