Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32440

in Graceville, FloridaPopulation 8,253

37.58/ 100

Ranked #28,245 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.0%)

Ranked #919 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 5.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

19.3%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

147.3 days/year

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.7%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.2%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

41.9%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13.4 mi

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.6%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Graceville, Florida (ZIP 32440) lands in the bottom 12.0% nationally (28,245th) and the bottom 5.7% of Florida (919th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 9.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled uninsured sits in the top 5.1% nationally, humid heat lands in the top 5.4% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 8.7% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 9.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep registers in the top 9.5% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 9.8% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 32425, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.0 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $59,246 predicts 78.0 years — 5.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,541 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.0 ± 0.9 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.8 years — 2.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,171 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 87.0; chronic-disease standing 19.7 — 67 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,237 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.6–31.8
High blood pressure among adults43.3%39.8–46.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.7–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.4–12.9
Depression among adults19.6%17.1–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.7–18.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%35.7–42.4
Obesity among adults41.1%35.9–46.7
Stroke among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.7%18.0–23.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.3%16.1–22.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.5–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%72.3–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults80.7%78.4–82.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.5%55.5–63.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.5%41.6–47.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%66.9–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.2–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.5%20.6–26.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.0%30.1–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults41.9%37.4–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.2%26.0–32.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.3–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.5–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.5–21.8
Any disability among adults41.0%37.1–45.2
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
Mobility disability among adults20.7%18.5–23.0
Self-care disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Vision disability among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)18.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription86.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate67.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households55.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$59,246$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$115,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$832$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.0 yr ± 0.4478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.44 years of 73.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured