ZIP code
74047
in Liberty, OklahomaPopulation 7,227
43.87/ 100
Ranked #23,547 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)
Ranked #175 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 28%)
Ranked #31 of 88 Tulsa, OK ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
68.5%
in the bottom 8.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST59thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
49.8 days/year
in the top 9.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST25thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the top 10.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS90thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
6.1%
in the top 10.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS89thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
2.7%
in the bottom 30% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS30thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›The read
Liberty, Oklahoma (ZIP 74047), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 27% nationally (23,547th) and the top 28% of Oklahoma (175th).
The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: fiber broadband sits in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, modeled mammography settles in the bottom 8.8% nationally, extreme heat registers in the top 9.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 10.4% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 10.6% nationally, and modeled fine-particle is in the top 14.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides in the top 15% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 18% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 19% nationally. Childcare sits at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.
Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 74008, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tulsa, OK metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 51%
16%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 34%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 27%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 36%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 24%
8%
Disability
healthier than 31%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 20%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 67%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 81%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 65%
11%
Disability
healthier than 73%
7%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 51%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 62%
8%
Disability
healthier than 66%
7%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 53%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 53%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 54%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 51%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $72,292 predicts 78.8 years — 3.2 years below.
Ranked #4,325 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74008
Oklahomashares a border
Score 55.68
Closest healthier
74033
Oklahomashares a border
Score 47.31
Similar health profile
73014
Oklahoma98% similar profile
Score 38.25
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.5% | 28.3–32.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 40.0% | 37.2–42.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.7% | 8.1–9.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.9% | 11.0–12.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.7% | 7.1–8.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.5% | 7.7–9.2 |
| Depression among adults | 26.0% | 23.6–28.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.3% | 12.0–14.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.7% | 36.8–42.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.5% | 35.8–44.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.9% | 3.7–4.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.4% | 13.3–17.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.0% | 8.0–10.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.1% | 74.9–79.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.5% | 76.2–80.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.2% | 84.8–87.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 61.6% | 58.0–64.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.1% | 55.4–60.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 68.5% | 62.7–73.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.9% | 12.2–15.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.7% | 15.9–19.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 31.0% | 27.9–34.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.3% | 33.3–41.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.9% | 19.0–22.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.9% | 16.5–19.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.9% | 13.7–16.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.8% | 15.4–18.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.1% | 36.1–41.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.7% | 8.9–10.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.3% | 8.6–10.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.4% | 15.9–18.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.3% | 4.0–4.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.7% | 5.3–6.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.6% | 22.0–27.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.1% | 14.4–17.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.3% | 11.5–15.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.7% | 11.3–14.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 7.8–9.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.9% | 28.6–35.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.6% | 8.6–10.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 13.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 22.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 22.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 93.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 82.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 6.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 50.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 14.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 40.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $72,292 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $210,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $788 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.6 yr ± 0.56 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured