ZIP code
74034
in Hallett, OklahomaPopulation 149
35.23/ 100
Ranked #29,298 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)
Ranked #481 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 24%)
Ranked #65 of 88 Tulsa, OK ZIPs (bottom 26%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
13.3%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Mammography
65%
in the bottom 2.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST18thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.4%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.4%
in the top 4.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
10.9%
in the bottom 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
49.6%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
1.8%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
21.2 mi
in the top 4.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
45.8%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.6%
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Hallett, Oklahoma (ZIP 74034) lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally (29,298th) and the bottom 24% of Oklahoma (481st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled hearing disability lies in the top 1.5% nationally, and mammography resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 3.0% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 3.8% nationally, high cholesterol rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and stroke is in the top 6.9% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 2.9% nationally, housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 4.3% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 74020, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tulsa, OK metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 20%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 32%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 39%
8%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 7%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 74%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 79%
8%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 48%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 58%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Disability
healthier than 21%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 9%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 73%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 93%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 47%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 32%
16%
Disability
healthier than 19%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 8%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74020
Oklahomashares a border
Score 39.63
Closest healthier
74038
Oklahomashares a border
Score 37.78
Similar health profile
75630
Texas100% similar profile
Score 33.53
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.1% | 35.1–43.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 49.6% | 44.9–54.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.5% | 10.3–12.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.5% | 10.2–13.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.4% | 10.0–13.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.8% | 10.9–15.2 |
| Depression among adults | 25.0% | 21.5–28.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.7% | 15.4–20.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.8% | 41.0–50.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.4% | 33.2–49.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.6% | 4.9–6.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.9% | 15.4–22.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.9% | 8.6–13.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.0% | 80.2–85.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.2% | 78.8–85.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.5% | 86.7–90.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.1% | 53.4–64.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 57.9% | 53.8–61.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 65.0% | 54.9–74.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.9% | 8.7–13.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.8% | 17.6–24.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.8% | 32.3–43.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.9% | 29.0–43.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 26.6% | 23.0–31.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.7% | 14.7–18.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.3% | 16.0–20.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.3% | 15.2–19.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 44.8% | 39.7–50.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 13.3% | 11.8–15.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.9–13.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.4% | 21.3–28.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.9% | 5.0–6.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.4% | 6.5–8.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.3% | 20.2–28.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.3% | 14.9–22.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.3% | 13.2–20.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 10.3–14.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.6% | 7.3–10.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.7% | 25.5–36.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.4% | 8.0–11.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 23.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 22.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 23.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 6.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 75.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 1.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 89.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.5% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 59.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 24.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 45.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $40,625 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $62,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $1,083 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.4 yr ± 3.07 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.07 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured