How the Tulsa, OK metro's ZIP codes measure up on health
The ZipVitals Score across the Tulsa, OK metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.
Data release 202688 of 90 ZIP codes scored · 1.0M residents represented
Score snapshot
People & national context
The Tulsa, OK metro's ZIP codes, ranked
Highest-scoring
Top 50 of 88- 4,77474137in Tulsa · 28,533 residents60.11
- 6,80374114in Tulsa · 15,944 residents57.50
- 8,65674008in Bixby · 34,006 residents55.68
- 9,67874037in Jenks · 24,547 residents54.81
- 10,25674133in Tulsa · 48,699 residents54.35
- 10,45974011in Broken Arrow · 33,900 residents54.19
- 11,37074135in Tulsa · 20,138 residents53.49
- 12,81874119in Tulsa · 3,670 residents52.46
- 12,89174055in Owasso · 51,381 residents52.41
- 13,03674012in Broken Arrow · 65,060 residents52.31
- 13,27074132in Tulsa · 10,858 residents52.14
- 14,92674014in Broken Arrow · 45,212 residents50.95
- 16,18074105in Tulsa · 26,951 residents50.05
- 16,53274021in Collinsville · 23,628 residents49.79
- 18,40774019in Claremore · 21,023 residents48.41
- 19,19574120in Tulsa · 5,195 residents47.79
- 19,78474033in Glenpool · 13,745 residents47.31
- 20,22874134in Tulsa · 23,323 residents46.95
- 21,03574104in Tulsa · 12,806 residents46.26
- 21,08474429in Coweta · 16,622 residents46.21
- 21,23174456in Preston · 78 residents46.11
- 21,31874136in Tulsa · 31,416 residents46.03
- 21,74874145in Tulsa · 18,196 residents45.62
- 21,76874060in Prue · 334 residents45.61
- 22,95774103in Tulsa · 2,450 residents44.46
- 23,11274017in Claremore · 29,206 residents44.31
- 23,17374053in Oologah · 5,375 residents44.25
- 23,17774070in Skiatook · 15,447 residents44.25
- 23,28674041in Kiefer · 3,073 residents44.14
- 23,52274080in Talala · 3,003 residents43.88
- 23,54774047in Liberty · 7,227 residents43.87
- 23,69874445in Morris · 3,051 residents43.70
- 23,83974063in Sand Springs · 31,370 residents43.56
- 23,98474036in Inola · 7,799 residents43.43
- 24,17374458in Redbird · 194 residents43.24
- 24,33274073in Sperry · 5,881 residents43.05
- 24,44174652in Shidler · 793 residents42.93
- 24,48174015in Catoosa · 8,676 residents42.89
- 24,53774454in Porter · 2,831 residents42.81
- 24,60374044in Mannford · 8,162 residents42.74
- 24,65474066in Sapulpa · 32,292 residents42.69
- 25,62574633in Burbank · 557 residents41.54
- 26,30674131in Sapulpa · 2,435 residents40.66
- 26,50474002in Barnsdall · 1,925 residents40.37
- 26,70574058in Pawnee · 3,558 residents40.07
- 26,83074421in Winchester · 4,360 residents39.90
- 26,83374637in Fairfax · 1,510 residents39.89
- 26,85774001in Avant · 258 residents39.85
- 26,94374112in Tulsa · 21,386 residents39.71
- 26,95274028in Depew · 1,526 residents39.69
Lowest-scoring
Bottom 50 of 88- 31,82274110in Tulsa · 15,244 residents20.89
- 31,63074126in Tulsa · 9,920 residents23.29
- 31,58174115in Tulsa · 24,297 residents23.80
- 31,48174130in Tulsa · 2,212 residents24.94
- 31,26774050in Oakhurst · 475 residents26.85
- 31,22274106in Tulsa · 15,655 residents27.13
- 31,14674880in Weleetka · 1,840 residents27.70
- 31,07174146in Tulsa · 16,507 residents28.22
- 30,88474437in Henryetta · 8,937 residents29.41
- 30,72474052in Oilton · 1,065 residents30.22
- 30,55174128in Tulsa · 13,751 residents31.01
- 30,28474084in Wynona · 380 residents32.13
- 30,25374447in Okmulgee · 15,786 residents32.23
- 30,13774127in Tulsa · 16,324 residents32.65
- 30,10574054in Osage · 859 residents32.75
- 30,07974071in Slick · 130 residents32.88
- 30,00274107in Tulsa · 19,013 residents33.17
- 29,99474016in Chelsea · 5,891 residents33.21
- 29,94674035in Hominy · 4,021 residents33.35
- 29,74474446in Okay · 436 residents33.98
- 29,69874116in Tulsa · 3,617 residents34.10
- 29,49274030in Drumright · 3,014 residents34.70
- 29,46674129in Tulsa · 18,382 residents34.78
- 29,29874034in Hallett · 149 residents35.23
- 29,09274460in Schulter · 377 residents35.77
- 29,06274431in Dewar · 895 residents35.87
- 28,90874056in Pawhuska · 4,864 residents36.20
- 28,52874046in Milfay · 58 residents37.00
- 28,45874108in Tulsa · 7,315 residents37.14
- 28,43974467in Wagoner · 14,400 residents37.19
- 28,15674038in Jennings · 2,175 residents37.78
- 28,02874010in Bristow · 10,311 residents37.98
- 27,99974045in Maramec · 248 residents38.02
- 27,86374081in Terlton · 1,829 residents38.26
- 27,45474039in Kellyville · 3,826 residents38.92
- 27,04574117in Tulsa · 52 residents39.56
- 26,99474020in Cleveland · 7,587 residents39.63
- 26,99074650in Ralston · 608 residents39.64
- 26,95274028in Depew · 1,526 residents39.69
- 26,94374112in Tulsa · 21,386 residents39.71
- 26,85774001in Avant · 258 residents39.85
- 26,83374637in Fairfax · 1,510 residents39.89
- 26,83074421in Winchester · 4,360 residents39.90
- 26,70574058in Pawnee · 3,558 residents40.07
- 26,50474002in Barnsdall · 1,925 residents40.37
- 26,30674131in Sapulpa · 2,435 residents40.66
- 25,62574633in Burbank · 557 residents41.54
- 24,65474066in Sapulpa · 32,292 residents42.69
- 24,60374044in Mannford · 8,162 residents42.74
- 24,53774454in Porter · 2,831 residents42.81
Where each domain sits inside this metro
The Score above is one number for the whole Tulsa, OK metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.
The highest-standing fifth
18 of 88 ZIPsShare of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.
Each fifth is about 18 of this metro’s 88 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 1,032,060 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.
The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.
Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.
Why this matters
The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Tulsa, OK figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.