Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65618

in Brixey, MissouriPopulation 110

32.39/ 100

Ranked #30,206 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranked #912 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 8.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mobility disability

29.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

14.1%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.6%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Brixey, Missouri (ZIP 65618) ranks in the bottom 5.9% nationally (30,206th) and the bottom 8.2% of Missouri (912th).

continue reading

Plainly, the numbers point to a handful of defining readings: modeled mobility disability rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 1.3% nationally, self-care disability settles in the top 3.9% nationally, and diabetes rests in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 3.9% nationally. On the brighter side, housing-cost burden settles at the national minimum, and modeled transportation noise rests at the national minimum.

Against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 65608, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.1%39.5–48.5
High blood pressure among adults51.0%46.0–55.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.0–13.9
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults12.4%10.7–14.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.9%12.8–19.5
Depression among adults25.3%21.5–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.5%17.5–23.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.8%41.8–51.8
Obesity among adults42.4%33.8–51.2
Stroke among adults6.6%5.7–7.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.2%26.2–36.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%6.8–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.2%82.3–87.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%80.2–86.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.2–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%56.9–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.3%47.5–55.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.3%58.0–75.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%8.7–13.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.3%17.6–27.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.8%33.7–47.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%30.8–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.3%26.8–38.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.3–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults22.0%18.6–25.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.7%17.4–24.5
Any disability among adults49.7%43.1–56.4
Hearing disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
Independent living disability among adults14.1%11.7–17.1
Mobility disability among adults29.4%24.5–34.8
Self-care disability among adults7.6%6.3–9.2
Vision disability among adults9.3%7.7–11.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.2–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.7%14.1–23.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.6%12.3–21.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.2–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.4–12.5
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.2–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.3–12.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6491.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households61.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+30.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age54.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$140,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.3 yr ± 2.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.78 years of 86.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured