Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

65614

in Bradleyville, MissouriPopulation 567

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

43.54/ 100

Ranked #23,868 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #510 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

53.7%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

27.5 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

75.5%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.5%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13 mi

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

3.3%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Bradleyville, Missouri (ZIP 65614) lands in the bottom 26% nationally (23,868th) and the bottom 49% of Missouri (510th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: distance to an emergency room stands in the top 2.4% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 9.4% nationally. More encouragingly, park land sits in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and modeled tree cover settles in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 9.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 12.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 65629, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%31.7–38.8
High blood pressure among adults41.6%37.4–45.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.2–12.6
Depression among adults25.6%22.2–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.3–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.9–45.1
Obesity among adults38.5%31.6–45.8
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.6–17.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.6–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.7–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.8–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%60.2–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.1%55.5–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.6–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.1–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%16.9–23.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.3%27.2–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%31.3–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%20.5–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.3–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.2–21.3
Any disability among adults40.7%36.0–45.6
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.2–12.4
Mobility disability among adults20.0%17.2–23.0
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.8
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.5–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.9–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%9.9–15.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.9–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Loneliness among adults29.9%25.4–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6413.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)12.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)7.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription74.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate82.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+13.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$61,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$153,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$877$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured