Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

65330

in Gilliam, MissouriPopulation 575

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

34.91/ 100

Ranked #29,432 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.3%)

Ranked #865 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 12.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

45.1%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

67.3 mi

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.2%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.2%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$42,188

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

11.2 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Gilliam, Missouri (ZIP 65330) lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally (29,432nd) and the bottom 12.9% of Missouri (865th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled pfas lands in the bottom 9.6% nationally. On the other hand, floodplain exposure registers in the top 5.0% nationally, and modeled hearing disability sits in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 8.5% nationally, energy burden is in the top 6.5% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 10.2% nationally. Poverty settles in the top 12.0% nationally, modeled mobility disability lies in the top 12.5% nationally, and household income resides in the bottom 7.0% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 65246, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.0–38.5
High blood pressure among adults41.6%37.3–46.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.8%10.2–13.4
Depression among adults26.0%22.3–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.0–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%37.1–46.2
Obesity among adults40.3%32.5–48.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.1%19.0–27.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.8–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.0–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.3–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.6–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.7–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.3%49.2–57.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%63.3–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.1–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%18.2–24.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.2%30.8–41.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%33.1–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.4%22.8–29.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.3–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.6–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%17.7–22.7
Any disability among adults43.8%38.8–48.9
Hearing disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.7
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.1
Mobility disability among adults21.2%18.3–24.0
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%16.6–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%13.6–20.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.6–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.6–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.2–11.2
Loneliness among adults32.6%27.3–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.4–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6410.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)14.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription84.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households38.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+9.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age30.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$42,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$110,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$588$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured